Combination of the new gold standard for man and machine for operating room

After discussing the various aspects of robotics, artificial intelligence, and automation in the operating room, a panelist at the BIOMEDevice Boston session, “Surgical robots, digital technology, and the data that govern the operating room” posed a provocative question by an audience member: Will doctors be replaced by robots?

Attendees likened the issue to a similar challenge faced by the U.S. Air Force with the invention of drone technology, which, in some ways, divided the job of a fighter pilot, one of the most prestigious, respected and competitive positions in the United States. air forces. He said that someone with secondary education and six months of training could operate a drone, but added that there was still a need for the human decision-making and manual operation that a fighter pilot would provide.

“Do you think it is possible for surgery to go the same way?” Present asked. “Will there be a bifurcation of robotic surgery by someone trained in robotic surgery, and then conventional surgery by someone trained in conventional methods, perhaps even dealing in completely different specialties?”

All members of the committee participated in this issue. Among them were Alexandra Popovich, Director of Innovation Program, Imagine Guided Therapy at Philips; Tal Windero, Partner, Genesis MedTech; Arvind Ramadurai, Senior Director, Global Marketing and Profit and Loss Owner, Digital Assisted Surgery, Surgical Robotics at Medtronic; and Harel Gadot, Chairman of the MEDX Ventures Group of Companies. Most said the robots would act as a safety measure and would perform normal tasks, while leaving the complex decision-making skills of human doctors.

Wenderow explained that, for very complex procedures, it’s not worth designing an automated program for half a percent of the cases it can be done. “I think if you split in two, you lose the main ingredient, which is the doctor,” he said. “I still need to make the decision.” But he added that using robots would enable doctors to do more procedures.

Radiologists may have once felt threatened because AI can catch tumors [that might have been missed]But now they see it as a complement to their practice, Ramadorai said. “I think it would be a similar model where the robot can take on some normal tasks, some safety tasks, while the surgeon can do the most value-added activities,” he explained. “The [physician] They can be more selective about where they actually spend their time and effort. So, a combination of man and machine would be better than either one alone.”

Earlier in the presentation before the question was asked, Popovich said she believed doctors would take care of patients and that automation would exclude technical tasks. You touched on bringing bots into action versus bringing actions into bots. “We must make procedures more effective to improve outcomes, to improve staff satisfaction, and to delight clinicians,” she said, adding that physician fatigue has been a problem for too long. “To improve this procedure, to be able to get better patient care, and also to make health care providers happy.”

Gadot gave a glimpse into the question and thought if we would lose the manual skills of a doctor on the rare occasions we need them. “It would be a disaster,” he said. “The question that has always been, how do we look in the opposite direction? I think robots are going to be the gold standard. How do we prepare for the rare occasion where we need the human factor? And to be honest with you, I don’t have an answer for that.”

#Combination #gold #standard #man #machine #operating #room

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *